1981 Pearson 36 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison
1981 Pearson 36
Hanse 342
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1981 Pearson 36 | Hanse 342 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pearson | Hanse |
| Year | 1981–1985 | 2006–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | William Shaw | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.67 m (35.0 ft) | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) |
| LWL | 8.84 m (29.0 ft) | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.51 m (11.5 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 6,124 kg (13,501 lbs) | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 51.6 m² (555 ft²) | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 22 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 100 L (26.4 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 7 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1981 Pearson 36 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1981 Pearson 36 is a 1980s design by Pearson from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1981 Pearson 36 was penned by William Shaw. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1981 Pearson 36 measures 10.67m (35.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.51m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 1981 Pearson 36 is 0.37m longer than the Hanse 342. The 1981 Pearson 36 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1981 Pearson 36 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.66 and 51.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1981 Pearson 36 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 20.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.7% for the 1981 Pearson 36 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1981 Pearson 36 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1981 Pearson 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1981 Pearson 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1981 Pearson 36 · Hanse 342