1982 Island Packet 31 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1982 Island Packet 31
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Island Packet 311986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerIsland PacketPacific Seacraft
Year1982–19941986–2007
TypeCutterSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob JohnsonWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL8.08 m (26.5 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam3.35 m (11.0 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft1.22 m (4.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,897 kg (13,001 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast2,449 kg (5,399 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area49.2 m² (530 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine25 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Island Packet 31
15.32
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Island Packet 31
41.53
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Island Packet 31
0.74
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Island Packet 31
25.11
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Island Packet 31 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent different approaches to sailboat design. The 1982 Island Packet 31 is a 1980s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1982 Island Packet 31 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1982 Island Packet 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1982 Island Packet 31 is 1.83m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1982 Island Packet 31 displaces approximately 160% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Island Packet 31 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.32 and 49.2 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 Island Packet 31 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Island Packet 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 25.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 41.5% for the 1982 Island Packet 31 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Island Packet 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 189L of water capacity and 114L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 Island Packet 31 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1982 Island Packet 31 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Island Packet 31 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25