1982 S2 7.9 vs 1976 C&C 33 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9
VS
1976 C&C 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 7.91976 C&C 33
General
ManufacturerS2C&C Yachts
Year1982–19881976–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSACanada
DesignerArthur EdmundsCuthbertson & Cassian
Dimensions
LOA7.90 m (25.9 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.6 m² (340 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
1976 C&C 33
15.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
1976 C&C 33
45.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
1976 C&C 33
0.81
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
1976 C&C 33
18.07

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and 1976 C&C 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1976 C&C 33 is a 1970s offering from C&C Yachts from Canada. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1976 C&C 33 was designed by Cuthbertson & Cassian.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1976 C&C 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1976 C&C 33 is 2.16m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The 1976 C&C 33 displaces approximately 100% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The 1976 C&C 33, with an SA/D of 15.57 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 1976 C&C 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.81. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 45.0% for the 1976 C&C 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1976 C&C 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1976 C&C 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1976 C&C 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · 1976 C&C 33