1982 S2 7.9 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 7.91984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerS2Moody
Year1982–19881984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerArthur EdmundsBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA7.90 m (25.9 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.6 m² (340 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 2.16m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 129% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Moody 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · 1984 Moody 33