1982 S2 7.9 vs 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 — Comparison
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1982 S2 7.9 | 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | S2 | Hallberg-Rassy |
| Year | 1982–1988 | 2000–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Arthur Edmunds | German Frers |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.90 m (25.9 ft) | 9.47 m (31.1 ft) |
| LWL | 6.71 m (22.0 ft) | 8.25 m (27.1 ft) |
| Beam | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) | 3.18 m (10.4 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.60 m (5.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,268 kg (5,000 lbs) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) |
| Ballast | 907 kg (2,000 lbs) | 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 31.6 m² (340 ft²) | 44.5 m² (479 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 10 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 140 L (37.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1982 S2 7.9 and 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was designed by German Frers.
In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 at 9.47m (31.1ft) with a 3.18m beam. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is 1.57m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 103% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31