1982 S2 7.9 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison

1982 S2 7.9
VS
Hanse 320Hanse 320

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 S2 7.9Hanse 320
General
ManufacturerS2Hanse
Year1982–19882005–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerArthur Edmundsjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA7.90 m (25.9 ft)9.92 m (32.5 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.80 m (28.9 ft)
Beam2.84 m (9.3 ft)3.28 m (10.8 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.70 m (5.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)4,600 kg (10,141 lbs)
Ballast907 kg (2,000 lbs)1,400 kg (3,086 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area31.6 m² (340 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)90 L (23.8 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 S2 7.9
18.61
Hanse 320
16.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 S2 7.9
39.99
Hanse 320
30.43
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 S2 7.9
0.87
Hanse 320
0.79
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 S2 7.9
17.38
Hanse 320
17.40

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 S2 7.9 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 S2 7.9 is a 1980s design by S2 from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1982 S2 7.9 was penned by Arthur Edmunds. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1982 S2 7.9 measures 7.90m (25.9ft) overall with a beam of 2.84m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 2.02m longer than the 1982 S2 7.9. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 103% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 S2 7.9 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.61 and 31.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1982 S2 7.9 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 S2 7.9 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.4) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.87). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1982 S2 7.9 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 S2 7.9 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1982 S2 7.9 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hanse 320 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 S2 7.9 · Hanse 320