1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1984 Ericson 38 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1984 Ericson 381984 Ericson 38

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Westerly Konsort1984 Ericson 38
General
ManufacturerWesterlyEricson
Year1982–19901984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisBruce King / Ron Holland
Dimensions
LOA9.50 m (31.2 ft)11.58 m (38.0 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.66 m (12.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.98 m (6.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)7,484 kg (16,499 lbs)
Ballast1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)60.0 m² (646 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP30 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1984 Ericson 38
15.93
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1984 Ericson 38
42.42
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1984 Ericson 38
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1984 Ericson 38
20.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1984 Ericson 38 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1984 Ericson 38 is a 1980s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1984 Ericson 38 was designed by Bruce King / Ron Holland.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1984 Ericson 38 at 11.58m (38.0ft) with a 3.66m beam. The 1984 Ericson 38 is 2.08m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1984 Ericson 38 displaces approximately 65% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Ericson 38, with an SA/D of 15.93 and 60.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Ericson 38 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Ericson 38 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 42.4% for the 1984 Ericson 38, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1984 Ericson 38 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Ericson 38 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Ericson 38 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Westerly Konsort · 1984 Ericson 38