1982 Westerly Konsort vs 1984 Pearson 34 — Comparison

1982 Westerly Konsort1982 Westerly Konsort
VS
1984 Pearson 341984 Pearson 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1982 Westerly Konsort1984 Pearson 34
General
ManufacturerWesterlyPearson
Year1982–19901984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUKUSA
DesignerEd DuboisWilliam Shaw
Dimensions
LOA9.50 m (31.2 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.70 m (25.3 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam3.10 m (10.2 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.60 m (5.2 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area34.0 m² (366 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeBilgeFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)152 L (40.2 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1982 Westerly Konsort
12.61
1984 Pearson 34
15.11
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1982 Westerly Konsort
36.00
1984 Pearson 34
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1982 Westerly Konsort
0.75
1984 Pearson 34
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1982 Westerly Konsort
22.75
1984 Pearson 34
20.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1982 Westerly Konsort and 1984 Pearson 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1982 Westerly Konsort is a 1980s design by Westerly from UK, while the 1984 Pearson 34 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1982 Westerly Konsort was penned by Ed Dubois. The 1984 Pearson 34 was designed by William Shaw.

In terms of size, the 1982 Westerly Konsort measures 9.50m (31.2ft) overall with a beam of 3.10m, compared to the 1984 Pearson 34 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1984 Pearson 34 is 0.86m longer than the 1982 Westerly Konsort. The 1984 Pearson 34 displaces approximately 20% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1982 Westerly Konsort has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 12.61 and 34.0 m² of sail area. The 1984 Pearson 34, with an SA/D of 15.11 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 Pearson 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1982 Westerly Konsort offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.75). The 1984 Pearson 34 has a comfort ratio of 20.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 36.0% for the 1982 Westerly Konsort and 41.7% for the 1984 Pearson 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1982 Westerly Konsort provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1984 Pearson 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1982 Westerly Konsort is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Pearson 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1982 Westerly Konsort · 1984 Pearson 34