1983 Sabre 28 vs 1978 Sabre 30 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
1978 Sabre 301978 Sabre 30

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 281978 Sabre 30
General
ManufacturerSabreSabre
Year1983–19901978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)2.97 m (9.7 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,451 kg (3,199 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)37.0 m² (398 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1978 Sabre 30
15.92
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1978 Sabre 30
39.98
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1978 Sabre 30
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1978 Sabre 30
20.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1978 Sabre 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1978 Sabre 30 is a 1970s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1978 Sabre 30 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1978 Sabre 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 2.97m beam. The 1978 Sabre 30 is 0.61m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1978 Sabre 30 displaces approximately 7% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1978 Sabre 30, with an SA/D of 15.92 and 37.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1978 Sabre 30 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1978 Sabre 30 has a comfort ratio of 20.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 40.0% for the 1978 Sabre 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1978 Sabre 30 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1978 Sabre 30 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 1978 Sabre 30