1983 Sabre 28 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 281983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerSabreIrwin
Year1983–19901983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 1.22m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 47% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Sabre 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Sabre 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 1983 Irwin 32