1983 Sabre 28 vs 1990 Island Packet 29 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
1990 Island Packet 291990 Island Packet 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 281990 Island Packet 29
General
ManufacturerSabreIsland Packet
Year1983–19901990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonBob Johnson
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.12 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)3,856 kg (8,501 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)132 L (34.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1990 Island Packet 29
13.84
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1990 Island Packet 29
41.18
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1990 Island Packet 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1990 Island Packet 29
21.60

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1990 Island Packet 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1990 Island Packet 29 is a 1990s offering from Island Packet from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1990 Island Packet 29 was designed by Bob Johnson.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1990 Island Packet 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1990 Island Packet 29 is 0.31m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1990 Island Packet 29 displaces approximately 13% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1990 Island Packet 29, with an SA/D of 13.84 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Sabre 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1990 Island Packet 29 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 41.2% for the 1990 Island Packet 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1990 Island Packet 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Sabre 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 1990 Island Packet 29