1983 Sabre 28 vs 1991 Westerly Seahawk — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
1991 Westerly Seahawk1991 Westerly Seahawk

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 281991 Westerly Seahawk
General
ManufacturerSabreWesterly
Year1983–19901991–1997
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerRoger HewsonEd Dubois
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)6,123 kg (13,499 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)220 L (58.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths57
Cabins13

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1991 Westerly Seahawk
14.57
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1991 Westerly Seahawk
40.75
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1991 Westerly Seahawk
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1991 Westerly Seahawk
22.81

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1991 Westerly Seahawk represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1991 Westerly Seahawk is a 1990s offering from Westerly from UK. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk was designed by Ed Dubois.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1991 Westerly Seahawk at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is 1.83m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk, with an SA/D of 14.57 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Sabre 28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1991 Westerly Seahawk has a comfort ratio of 22.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 40.8% for the 1991 Westerly Seahawk, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers 7 berths in 3 cabins with 220L water and 114L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Sabre 28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1991 Westerly Seahawk offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 1991 Westerly Seahawk