1983 Sabre 28 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
Hunter 27Hunter 27

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 28Hunter 27
General
ManufacturerSabreHunter
Year1983–19901992–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)2.79 m (9.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)907 kg (2,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)33.0 m² (355 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
Hunter 27
18.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
Hunter 27
36.35
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
Hunter 27
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
Hunter 27
16.96

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The 1983 Sabre 28 is 0.30m longer than the Hunter 27. The 1983 Sabre 28 displaces approximately 36% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hunter 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hunter 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · Hunter 27