1983 Sabre 28 vs 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 281994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
General
ManufacturerSabreHallberg-Rassy
Year1983–19901994–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerRoger HewsonOlle Enderlein
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)8.85 m (29.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)7.70 m (25.3 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.02 m (9.9 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.50 m (4.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)3,700 kg (8,157 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,500 kg (3,307 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)38.0 m² (409 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
16.14
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
40.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29
20.16

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is a 1990s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 was designed by Olle Enderlein.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 at 8.85m (29.0ft) with a 3.02m beam. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 is 0.32m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 displaces approximately 9% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, with an SA/D of 16.14 and 38.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.2 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 40.5% for the 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 100L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 1994 Hallberg-Rassy 29