1983 Sabre 28 vs Catalina 34 MkII — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
Catalina 34 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 28Catalina 34 MkII
General
ManufacturerSabreCatalina
Year1983–19901995–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.36 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
Catalina 34 MkII
17.08
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
Catalina 34 MkII
37.50
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
Catalina 34 MkII
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
Catalina 34 MkII
18.13

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and Catalina 34 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Catalina 34 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Catalina 34 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Catalina 34 MkII at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Catalina 34 MkII is 1.83m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The Catalina 34 MkII displaces approximately 60% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The Catalina 34 MkII, with an SA/D of 17.08 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Catalina 34 MkII has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Catalina 34 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 37.5% for the Catalina 34 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The Catalina 34 MkII offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Catalina 34 MkII has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 34 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · Catalina 34 MkII