1983 Sabre 28 vs Bavaria 34 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
Bavaria 34Bavaria 34

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 28Bavaria 34
General
ManufacturerSabreBavaria
Year1983–19901998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerRoger HewsonJ&J Design
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.35 m (34.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.10 m (29.9 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.38 m (11.1 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,700 kg (3,748 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)170 L (44.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
Bavaria 34
17.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
Bavaria 34
32.69
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
Bavaria 34
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
Bavaria 34
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and Bavaria 34 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the Bavaria 34 is a 1990s offering from Bavaria from Germany. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The Bavaria 34 was designed by J&J Design.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the Bavaria 34 at 10.35m (34.0ft) with a 3.38m beam. The Bavaria 34 is 1.82m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The Bavaria 34 displaces approximately 53% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The Bavaria 34, with an SA/D of 17.60 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Bavaria 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The Bavaria 34 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 32.7% for the Bavaria 34, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The Bavaria 34 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 170L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Bavaria 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Bavaria 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · Bavaria 34