1983 Sabre 28 vs 2010 Elan 340 — Comparison
1983 Sabre 28
2010 Elan 340
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1983 Sabre 28 | 2010 Elan 340 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Sabre | Elan |
| Year | 1983–1990 | 2010–2014 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Slovenia |
| Designer | Roger Hewson | Rob Humphreys |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 10.36 m (34.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) | 9.00 m (29.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.90 m (9.5 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.95 m (6.4 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 3,402 kg (7,500 lbs) | 5,800 kg (12,787 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 1,750 kg (3,858 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 35.3 m² (380 ft²) | 55.0 m² (592 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 15 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 45 L (11.9 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 160 L (42.3 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1983 Sabre 28 and 2010 Elan 340 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2010 Elan 340 is a modern offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2010 Elan 340 was designed by Rob Humphreys.
In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 2010 Elan 340 at 10.36m (34.0ft) with a 3.40m beam. The 2010 Elan 340 is 1.83m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 2010 Elan 340 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 2010 Elan 340, with an SA/D of 17.31 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 2010 Elan 340 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2010 Elan 340 has a comfort ratio of 19.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 30.2% for the 2010 Elan 340, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2010 Elan 340 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 160L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 2010 Elan 340 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 2010 Elan 340 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 2010 Elan 340