1983 Sabre 28 vs 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 — Comparison

1983 Sabre 281983 Sabre 28
VS
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1983 Sabre 282010 X-Yachts Xc 35
General
ManufacturerSabreX-Yachts
Year1983–19902010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSADenmark
DesignerRoger HewsonNiels Jeppesen
Dimensions
LOA8.53 m (28.0 ft)10.57 m (34.7 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,402 kg (7,500 lbs)5,800 kg (12,787 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area35.3 m² (380 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity45 L (11.9 gal)70 L (18.5 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1983 Sabre 28
15.86
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
16.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1983 Sabre 28
40.01
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
36.21
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1983 Sabre 28
0.77
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1983 Sabre 28
22.71
2010 X-Yachts Xc 35
19.28

Detailed Comparison

The 1983 Sabre 28 and 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1983 Sabre 28 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is a modern offering from X-Yachts from Denmark. The 1983 Sabre 28 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 was designed by Niels Jeppesen.

In terms of size, the 1983 Sabre 28 measures 8.53m (28.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 at 10.57m (34.7ft) with a 3.35m beam. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 is 2.04m longer than the 1983 Sabre 28. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 displaces approximately 70% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1983 Sabre 28 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 15.86 and 35.3 m² of sail area. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, with an SA/D of 16.37 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1983 Sabre 28 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has a comfort ratio of 19.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1983 Sabre 28 and 36.2% for the 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1983 Sabre 28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 45L of fuel. The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 70L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Sabre 28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1983 Sabre 28 · 2010 X-Yachts Xc 35