1984 J/29 vs Hunter 306 — Comparison

1984 J/29
VS
Hunter 306Hunter 306

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 J/29Hunter 306
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1984–19901999–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA8.99 m (29.5 ft)9.25 m (30.3 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)3,990 kg (8,796 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,588 kg (3,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.1 m² (442 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 J/29
18.97
Hunter 306
17.37
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 J/29
45.84
Hunter 306
39.80
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 J/29
0.89
Hunter 306
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 J/29
15.99
Hunter 306
19.11

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 J/29 and Hunter 306 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 J/29 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 306 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1984 J/29 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 306 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1984 J/29 measures 8.99m (29.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 306 at 9.25m (30.3ft) with a 3.10m beam. The Hunter 306 is 0.26m longer than the 1984 J/29. The Hunter 306 displaces approximately 22% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 J/29 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.97 and 41.1 m² of sail area. The Hunter 306, with an SA/D of 17.37 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1984 J/29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 J/29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The Hunter 306 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 45.8% for the 1984 J/29 and 39.8% for the Hunter 306, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 J/29 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 306 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 306 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 J/29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Hunter 306 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 J/29 · Hunter 306