1984 J/29 vs Catalina 323 — Comparison

1984 J/29
VS
Catalina 323

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 J/29Catalina 323
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsCatalina
Year1984–19902004–2009
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA8.99 m (29.5 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.75 m (5.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,266 kg (7,200 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast1,497 kg (3,300 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area41.1 m² (442 ft²)46.0 m² (495 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine10 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 J/29
18.97
Catalina 323
16.51
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 J/29
45.84
Catalina 323
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 J/29
0.89
Catalina 323
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 J/29
15.99
Catalina 323
18.34

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 J/29 and Catalina 323 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 J/29 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 323 is a 2000s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1984 J/29 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 323 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1984 J/29 measures 8.99m (29.5ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 323 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The Catalina 323 is 0.76m longer than the 1984 J/29. The Catalina 323 displaces approximately 46% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 J/29 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.97 and 41.1 m² of sail area. The Catalina 323, with an SA/D of 16.51 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 J/29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 J/29 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 16.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.89). The Catalina 323 has a comfort ratio of 18.3 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 45.8% for the 1984 J/29 and 38.1% for the Catalina 323, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 J/29 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 38L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 323 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Catalina 323 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 J/29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 323 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 J/29 · Catalina 323