1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1978 Cape Dory 270 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
1978 Cape Dory 270

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 261978 Cape Dory 270
General
ManufacturerMacGregorCape Dory
Year1984–19951978–1985
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger MacGregorCarl Alberg
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)6.40 m (21.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)2.59 m (8.5 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.14 m (3.7 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)28.0 m² (301 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP12 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)38 L (10.0 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
1978 Cape Dory 270
14.60
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
1978 Cape Dory 270
41.66
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
1978 Cape Dory 270
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
1978 Cape Dory 270
24.39

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1978 Cape Dory 270 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1978 Cape Dory 270 is a 1970s offering from Cape Dory from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 was designed by Carl Alberg.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1978 Cape Dory 270 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.59m beam. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is 0.43m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 displaces approximately 173% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1978 Cape Dory 270, with an SA/D of 14.60 and 28.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1978 Cape Dory 270 has a comfort ratio of 24.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 41.7% for the 1978 Cape Dory 270, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1978 Cape Dory 270 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 38L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1978 Cape Dory 270 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 1978 Cape Dory 270