1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1983 Pearson 31 — Comparison
1984 MacGregor 26
1983 Pearson 31
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 MacGregor 26 | 1983 Pearson 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | MacGregor | Pearson |
| Year | 1984–1995 | 1983–1990 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Roger MacGregor | William Shaw |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.71 m (22.0 ft) | 7.77 m (25.5 ft) |
| Beam | 2.59 m (8.5 ft) | 3.10 m (10.2 ft) |
| Draft | 0.61 m (2.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 227 kg (500 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 22.3 m² (240 ft²) | 40.0 m² (431 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Centerboard | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 5 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 15 L (4.0 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1983 Pearson 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1983 Pearson 31 is a 1980s offering from Pearson from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1983 Pearson 31 was designed by William Shaw.
In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1983 Pearson 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1983 Pearson 31 is 1.65m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The 1983 Pearson 31 displaces approximately 332% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1983 Pearson 31, with an SA/D of 15.35 and 40.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1983 Pearson 31 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 42.1% for the 1983 Pearson 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1983 Pearson 31 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1983 Pearson 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 1983 Pearson 31