1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1985 Sabre 32 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
1985 Sabre 321985 Sabre 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 261985 Sabre 32
General
ManufacturerMacGregorSabre
Year1984–19951985–1991
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger MacGregorRoger Hewson
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.45 m (4.8 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)4,082 kg (8,999 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)1,633 kg (3,600 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
1985 Sabre 32
16.71
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
1985 Sabre 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
1985 Sabre 32
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
1985 Sabre 32
18.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1985 Sabre 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1985 Sabre 32 is a 1980s offering from Sabre from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1985 Sabre 32 was designed by Roger Hewson.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1985 Sabre 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 1985 Sabre 32 is 1.95m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The 1985 Sabre 32 displaces approximately 309% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1985 Sabre 32, with an SA/D of 16.71 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1985 Sabre 32 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 40.0% for the 1985 Sabre 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1985 Sabre 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Sabre 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 1985 Sabre 32