1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 261986 Pacific Seacraft 25
General
ManufacturerMacGregorPacific Seacraft
Year1984–19951986–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger MacGregorWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)5.94 m (19.5 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)2.44 m (8.0 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.07 m (3.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)953 kg (2,101 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)24.0 m² (258 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP10 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)30 L (7.9 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
14.13
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
42.02
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
1986 Pacific Seacraft 25
25.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 at 7.62m (25.0ft) with a 2.44m beam. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is 0.18m longer than the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 displaces approximately 127% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, with an SA/D of 14.13 and 24.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 has a comfort ratio of 25.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 42.0% for the 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 30L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 1986 Pacific Seacraft 25