1984 MacGregor 26 vs Hunter 33 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
Hunter 33Hunter 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 26Hunter 33
General
ManufacturerMacGregorHunter
Year1984–19951988–1994
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger MacGregorHunter Design Team
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.35 m (11.0 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)4,763 kg (10,501 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)48.0 m² (517 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
Hunter 33
17.23
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
Hunter 33
38.09
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
Hunter 33
0.80
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
Hunter 33
18.10

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and Hunter 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the Hunter 33 is a 1980s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The Hunter 33 was designed by Hunter Design Team.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the Hunter 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.35m beam. The Hunter 33 is 2.26m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 377% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 33, with an SA/D of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The Hunter 33 has a comfort ratio of 18.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.80. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 38.1% for the Hunter 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The Hunter 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hunter 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · Hunter 33