1984 MacGregor 26 vs 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 321990 Wauquiez Centurion 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 261990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
General
ManufacturerMacGregorWauquiez
Year1984–19951990–1998
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAFrance
DesignerRoger MacGregorJean-Marie Finot
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)1,800 kg (3,968 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)65 L (17.2 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
40.00
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32
19.88

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is a 1990s offering from Wauquiez from France. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 was designed by Jean-Marie Finot.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.15m beam. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is 1.95m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 displaces approximately 351% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 has a comfort ratio of 19.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 40.0% for the 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 65L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 1990 Wauquiez Centurion 32