1984 MacGregor 26 vs Hunter 27 — Comparison
1984 MacGregor 26
Hunter 27
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 MacGregor 26 | Hunter 27 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | MacGregor | Hunter |
| Year | 1984–1995 | 1992–1998 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Roger MacGregor | Hunter Design Team |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) |
| LWL | 6.71 m (22.0 ft) | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) |
| Beam | 2.59 m (8.5 ft) | 2.79 m (9.2 ft) |
| Draft | 0.61 m (2.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 227 kg (500 lbs) | 907 kg (2,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 22.3 m² (240 ft²) | 33.0 m² (355 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Centerboard | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 5 HP | 12 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 15 L (4.0 gal) | 45 L (11.9 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 68 L (18.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 MacGregor 26 and Hunter 27 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the Hunter 27 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The Hunter 27 was designed by Hunter Design Team.
In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the Hunter 27 at 8.23m (27.0ft) with a 2.79m beam. The Hunter 27 is 0.43m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The Hunter 27 displaces approximately 150% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The Hunter 27, with an SA/D of 18.23 and 33.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The Hunter 27 has a comfort ratio of 17.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 36.4% for the Hunter 27, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The Hunter 27 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 68L water and 45L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 27 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · Hunter 27