1984 MacGregor 26 vs 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 — Comparison
1984 MacGregor 26
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 MacGregor 26 | 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | MacGregor | Hallberg-Rassy |
| Year | 1984–1995 | 2000–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Sweden |
| Designer | Roger MacGregor | German Frers |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 9.47 m (31.1 ft) |
| LWL | 6.71 m (22.0 ft) | 8.25 m (27.1 ft) |
| Beam | 2.59 m (8.5 ft) | 3.18 m (10.4 ft) |
| Draft | 0.61 m (2.0 ft) | 1.60 m (5.2 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) |
| Ballast | 227 kg (500 lbs) | 1,850 kg (4,079 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 22.3 m² (240 ft²) | 44.5 m² (479 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Centerboard | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 5 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 15 L (4.0 gal) | 80 L (21.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 140 L (37.0 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 MacGregor 26 and 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is a 2000s offering from Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 was designed by German Frers.
In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 at 9.47m (31.1ft) with a 3.18m beam. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is 1.67m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 displaces approximately 361% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 44.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 has a comfort ratio of 20.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 40.2% for the 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · 2000 Hallberg-Rassy 31