1984 MacGregor 26 vs Hanse 320 — Comparison
1984 MacGregor 26
Hanse 320
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1984 MacGregor 26 | Hanse 320 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | MacGregor | Hanse |
| Year | 1984–1995 | 2005–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Roger MacGregor | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 7.80 m (25.6 ft) | 9.92 m (32.5 ft) |
| LWL | 6.71 m (22.0 ft) | 8.80 m (28.9 ft) |
| Beam | 2.59 m (8.5 ft) | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) |
| Draft | 0.61 m (2.0 ft) | 1.70 m (5.6 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 998 kg (2,200 lbs) | 4,600 kg (10,141 lbs) |
| Ballast | 227 kg (500 lbs) | 1,400 kg (3,086 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 22.3 m² (240 ft²) | 46.0 m² (495 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Centerboard | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 5 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 15 L (4.0 gal) | 90 L (23.8 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 23 L (6.1 gal) | 150 L (39.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1984 MacGregor 26 and Hanse 320 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the Hanse 320 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The Hanse 320 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the Hanse 320 at 9.92m (32.5ft) with a 3.28m beam. The Hanse 320 is 2.12m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The Hanse 320 displaces approximately 361% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The Hanse 320, with an SA/D of 16.90 and 46.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The Hanse 320 has a comfort ratio of 17.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.79. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 30.4% for the Hanse 320, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The Hanse 320 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 90L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 320 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · Hanse 320