1984 MacGregor 26 vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

1984 MacGregor 261984 MacGregor 26
VS
Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 MacGregor 26Hanse 315
General
ManufacturerMacGregorHanse
Year1984–19952010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerRoger MacGregorjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA7.80 m (25.6 ft)9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL6.71 m (22.0 ft)8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam2.59 m (8.5 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft0.61 m (2.0 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement998 kg (2,200 lbs)4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast227 kg (500 lbs)1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area22.3 m² (240 ft²)41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeCenterboardFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine5 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity15 L (4.0 gal)85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity23 L (6.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths64
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.70
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 MacGregor 26
22.75
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 MacGregor 26
1.04
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 MacGregor 26
8.72
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 MacGregor 26 and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 MacGregor 26 is a 1980s design by MacGregor from USA, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1984 MacGregor 26 was penned by Roger MacGregor. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1984 MacGregor 26 measures 7.80m (25.6ft) overall with a beam of 2.59m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Hanse 315 is 1.85m longer than the 1984 MacGregor 26. The Hanse 315 displaces approximately 321% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 MacGregor 26 has generous sail power for spirited sailing with an SA/D ratio of 22.70 and 22.3 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 MacGregor 26 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 8.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 1.04). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 22.8% for the 1984 MacGregor 26 and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 MacGregor 26 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 23L of water capacity and 15L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 315 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 MacGregor 26 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 MacGregor 26 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 MacGregor 26 · Hanse 315