1984 Sabre 34 vs 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 — Comparison

1984 Sabre 34
VS
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1984 Sabre 341988 Pacific Seacraft 31
General
ManufacturerSabrePacific Seacraft
Year1984–19901988–2007
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRoger HewsonWilliam Crealock
Dimensions
LOA10.36 m (34.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.38 m (27.5 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.20 m (10.5 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement5,216 kg (11,499 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area50.2 m² (540 ft²)40.5 m² (436 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFull
Engine & Tanks
Engine22 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity152 L (40.2 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1984 Sabre 34
16.96
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1984 Sabre 34
41.74
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1984 Sabre 34
0.74
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1984 Sabre 34
21.14
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02

Detailed Comparison

The 1984 Sabre 34 and 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1984 Sabre 34 is a 1980s design by Sabre from USA, while the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s offering from Pacific Seacraft from USA. The 1984 Sabre 34 was penned by Roger Hewson. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was designed by William Crealock.

In terms of size, the 1984 Sabre 34 measures 10.36m (34.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.20m, compared to the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1984 Sabre 34 is 0.91m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1984 Sabre 34 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1984 Sabre 34 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.96 and 50.2 m² of sail area. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, with an SA/D of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1984 Sabre 34 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1984 Sabre 34 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.74). The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has a comfort ratio of 26.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.71. The ballast ratios are 41.7% for the 1984 Sabre 34 and 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1984 Sabre 34 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 152L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1984 Sabre 34 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1984 Sabre 34 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1984 Sabre 34 · 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31