1985 Catalina 30 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison

1985 Catalina 301985 Catalina 30
VS
Hanse 342Hanse 342

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1985 Catalina 30Hanse 342
General
ManufacturerCatalinaHanse
Year1985–19962006–2010
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerFrank Butlerjudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA9.14 m (30.0 ft)10.30 m (33.8 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)9.20 m (30.2 ft)
Beam3.25 m (10.7 ft)3.40 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)5,300 kg (11,684 lbs)
Ballast1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)1,650 kg (3,638 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.2 m² (433 ft²)52.0 m² (560 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)100 L (26.4 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)180 L (47.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths76
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1985 Catalina 30
14.91
Hanse 342
17.38
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1985 Catalina 30
39.99
Hanse 342
31.13
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1985 Catalina 30
0.79
Hanse 342
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1985 Catalina 30
22.23
Hanse 342
17.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1985 Catalina 30 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1985 Catalina 30 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1985 Catalina 30 was penned by Frank Butler. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1985 Catalina 30 measures 9.14m (30.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.25m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Hanse 342 is 1.16m longer than the 1985 Catalina 30. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 17% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1985 Catalina 30 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.91 and 40.2 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The Hanse 342 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1985 Catalina 30 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1985 Catalina 30 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1985 Catalina 30 provides 7 berths in 1 cabin with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1985 Catalina 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The Hanse 342 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1985 Catalina 30 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1985 Catalina 30 · Hanse 342