1986 Catalina 27 vs 1972 Contest 31 — Comparison

1986 Catalina 271986 Catalina 27
VS
1972 Contest 311972 Contest 31

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Catalina 271972 Contest 31
General
ManufacturerCatalinaContest
Year1986–19911972–1982
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSANetherlands
DesignerFrank ButlerDick Zaal
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL6.86 m (22.5 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam2.69 m (8.8 ft)3.05 m (10.0 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area30.9 m² (333 ft²)39.5 m² (425 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassSteel
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)150 L (39.6 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Catalina 27
16.11
1972 Contest 31
14.65
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Catalina 27
40.01
1972 Contest 31
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Catalina 27
0.77
1972 Contest 31
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Catalina 27
21.18
1972 Contest 31
23.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Catalina 27 and 1972 Contest 31 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Catalina 27 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1972 Contest 31 is a 1970s offering from Contest from Netherlands. The 1986 Catalina 27 was penned by Frank Butler. The 1972 Contest 31 was designed by Dick Zaal.

In terms of size, the 1986 Catalina 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1972 Contest 31 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Contest 31 is 1.22m longer than the 1986 Catalina 27. The 1972 Contest 31 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Catalina 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.11 and 30.9 m² of sail area. The 1972 Contest 31, with an SA/D of 14.65 and 39.5 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1986 Catalina 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Catalina 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1972 Contest 31 has a comfort ratio of 23.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Catalina 27 and 40.0% for the 1972 Contest 31, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Catalina 27 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1972 Contest 31 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 150L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1972 Contest 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Catalina 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Catalina 27 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Catalina 27 · 1972 Contest 31