1986 Catalina 27 vs 1984 Moody 33 — Comparison

1986 Catalina 271986 Catalina 27
VS
1984 Moody 331984 Moody 33

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Catalina 271984 Moody 33
General
ManufacturerCatalinaMoody
Year1986–19911984–1990
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUK
DesignerFrank ButlerBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)10.06 m (33.0 ft)
LWL6.86 m (22.5 ft)8.23 m (27.0 ft)
Beam2.69 m (8.8 ft)3.25 m (10.7 ft)
Draft1.52 m (5.0 ft)1.40 m (4.6 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,722 kg (6,001 lbs)5,200 kg (11,464 lbs)
Ballast1,089 kg (2,401 lbs)2,100 kg (4,630 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area30.9 m² (333 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP20 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)80 L (21.1 gal)
Water Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)140 L (37.0 gal)
Accommodation
Berths66
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Catalina 27
16.11
1984 Moody 33
14.90
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Catalina 27
40.01
1984 Moody 33
40.38
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Catalina 27
0.77
1984 Moody 33
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Catalina 27
21.18
1984 Moody 33
21.57

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Catalina 27 and 1984 Moody 33 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Catalina 27 is a 1980s design by Catalina from USA, while the 1984 Moody 33 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1986 Catalina 27 was penned by Frank Butler. The 1984 Moody 33 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1986 Catalina 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.69m, compared to the 1984 Moody 33 at 10.06m (33.0ft) with a 3.25m beam. The 1984 Moody 33 is 1.83m longer than the 1986 Catalina 27. The 1984 Moody 33 displaces approximately 91% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Catalina 27 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.11 and 30.9 m² of sail area. The 1984 Moody 33, with an SA/D of 14.90 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1986 Catalina 27 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Catalina 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.77). The 1984 Moody 33 has a comfort ratio of 21.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Catalina 27 and 40.4% for the 1984 Moody 33, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Catalina 27 provides 6 berths in 1 cabin with 76L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1984 Moody 33 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 140L water and 80L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1984 Moody 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Catalina 27 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Catalina 27 · 1984 Moody 33