1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F vs 1996 Moody 45 — Comparison

1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
VS
1996 Moody 451996 Moody 45

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F1996 Moody 45
General
ManufacturerHallberg-RassyMoody
Year1986–19951996–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountrySwedenUK
DesignerGerman FrersBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA12.80 m (42.0 ft)13.72 m (45.0 ft)
LWL10.20 m (33.5 ft)11.50 m (37.7 ft)
Beam3.90 m (12.8 ft)4.22 m (13.8 ft)
Draft2.00 m (6.6 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement10,500 kg (23,149 lbs)12,500 kg (27,558 lbs)
Ballast4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)4,900 kg (10,803 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area78.0 m² (840 ft²)85.0 m² (915 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine55 HP55 HP
Fuel Capacity200 L (52.8 gal)250 L (66.0 gal)
Water Capacity400 L (105.7 gal)450 L (118.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths78
Cabins33

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
16.52
1996 Moody 45
16.03
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
40.00
1996 Moody 45
39.20
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
0.71
1996 Moody 45
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F
21.84
1996 Moody 45
19.06

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F and 1996 Moody 45 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is a 1980s design by Hallberg-Rassy from Sweden, while the 1996 Moody 45 is a 1990s offering from Moody from UK. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F was penned by German Frers. The 1996 Moody 45 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F measures 12.80m (42.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.90m, compared to the 1996 Moody 45 at 13.72m (45.0ft) with a 4.22m beam. The 1996 Moody 45 is 0.92m longer than the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F. The 1996 Moody 45 displaces approximately 19% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.52 and 78.0 m² of sail area. The 1996 Moody 45, with an SA/D of 16.03 and 85.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.8) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1996 Moody 45 has a comfort ratio of 19.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F and 39.2% for the 1996 Moody 45, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F provides 7 berths in 3 cabins with 400L of water capacity and 200L of fuel. The 1996 Moody 45 offers 8 berths in 3 cabins with 450L water and 250L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1996 Moody 45 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Hallberg-Rassy 42F · 1996 Moody 45