1986 Island Packet 27 vs 1983 Irwin 32 — Comparison

1986 Island Packet 27
VS
1983 Irwin 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Island Packet 271983 Irwin 32
General
ManufacturerIsland PacketIrwin
Year1986–19941983–1988
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob JohnsonTed Irwin
Dimensions
LOA8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL7.01 m (23.0 ft)8.08 m (26.5 ft)
Beam2.90 m (9.5 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.07 m (3.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)
Ballast1,270 kg (2,800 lbs)2,041 kg (4,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area29.0 m² (312 ft²)41.0 m² (441 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine15 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)68 L (18.0 gal)
Water Capacity95 L (25.1 gal)114 L (30.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths46
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Island Packet 27
13.64
1983 Irwin 32
14.27
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Island Packet 27
40.00
1983 Irwin 32
40.90
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Island Packet 27
0.79
1983 Irwin 32
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Island Packet 27
21.72
1983 Irwin 32
22.12

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Island Packet 27 and 1983 Irwin 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 Island Packet 27 is a 1980s design by Island Packet from USA, while the 1983 Irwin 32 is a 1980s offering from Irwin from USA. The 1986 Island Packet 27 was penned by Bob Johnson. The 1983 Irwin 32 was designed by Ted Irwin.

In terms of size, the 1986 Island Packet 27 measures 8.23m (27.0ft) overall with a beam of 2.90m, compared to the 1983 Irwin 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1983 Irwin 32 is 1.52m longer than the 1986 Island Packet 27. The 1983 Irwin 32 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Island Packet 27 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 13.64 and 29.0 m² of sail area. The 1983 Irwin 32, with an SA/D of 14.27 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1983 Irwin 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Island Packet 27 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 21.7) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1983 Irwin 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Island Packet 27 and 40.9% for the 1983 Irwin 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Island Packet 27 provides 4 berths in 1 cabin with 95L of water capacity and 57L of fuel. The 1983 Irwin 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 68L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1983 Irwin 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1983 Irwin 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1983 Irwin 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Island Packet 27 · 1983 Irwin 32