1986 J/28 vs 1993 Najad 360 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
1993 Najad 3601993 Najad 360

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/281993 Najad 360
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsNajad
Year1986–19901993–2002
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASweden
DesignerRod JohnstoneJudel/Vrolijk
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.42 m (11.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.80 m (5.9 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)6,500 kg (14,330 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)55.0 m² (592 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
1993 Najad 360
16.04
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
1993 Najad 360
41.54
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
1993 Najad 360
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
1993 Najad 360
20.68

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and 1993 Najad 360 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 1993 Najad 360 is a 1990s offering from Najad from Sweden. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 1993 Najad 360 was designed by Judel/Vrolijk.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1993 Najad 360 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.42m beam. The 1993 Najad 360 is 2.31m longer than the 1986 J/28. The 1993 Najad 360 displaces approximately 120% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The 1993 Najad 360, with an SA/D of 16.04 and 55.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 1993 Najad 360 has a comfort ratio of 20.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 41.5% for the 1993 Najad 360, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 1993 Najad 360 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1993 Najad 360 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1993 Najad 360 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · 1993 Najad 360