1986 J/28 vs Catalina 28 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
Catalina 28Catalina 28

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/28Catalina 28
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsCatalina
Year1986–19901998–2004
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)8.69 m (28.5 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)7.62 m (25.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.90 m (9.5 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.37 m (4.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,812 kg (6,199 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,134 kg (2,500 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)33.5 m² (361 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)57 L (15.1 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths56
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
Catalina 28
17.09
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
Catalina 28
40.33
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
Catalina 28
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
Catalina 28
16.59

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and Catalina 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Catalina 28 is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Catalina 28 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Catalina 28 at 8.69m (28.5ft) with a 2.90m beam. The Catalina 28 is 0.03m longer than the 1986 J/28. The 1986 J/28 displaces approximately 5% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Catalina 28, with an SA/D of 17.09 and 33.5 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Catalina 28 has a comfort ratio of 16.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 40.3% for the Catalina 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Catalina 28 offers 6 berths in 1 cabin with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 J/28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · Catalina 28