1986 J/28 vs Hunter 280 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
Hunter 280Hunter 280

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/28Hunter 280
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHunter
Year1986–19901998–2003
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerRod JohnstoneGlenn Henderson
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)8.53 m (28.0 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)7.47 m (24.5 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.82 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)2,585 kg (5,699 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)998 kg (2,200 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
Hunter 280
18.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
Hunter 280
38.61
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
Hunter 280
0.82
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
Hunter 280
16.46

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and Hunter 280 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hunter 280 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hunter 280 was designed by Glenn Henderson.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hunter 280 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.82m beam. The 1986 J/28 is 0.13m longer than the Hunter 280. The 1986 J/28 displaces approximately 14% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Hunter 280, with an SA/D of 18.35 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Hunter 280 has a comfort ratio of 16.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.82. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 38.6% for the Hunter 280, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hunter 280 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1986 J/28 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · Hunter 280