1986 J/28 vs Hanse 342 — Comparison
Hanse 342
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1986 J/28 | Hanse 342 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | J/Boats | Hanse |
| Year | 1986–1990 | 2006–2010 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | Germany |
| Designer | Rod Johnstone | judel/vrolijk & co |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 8.66 m (28.4 ft) | 10.30 m (33.8 ft) |
| LWL | 7.32 m (24.0 ft) | 9.20 m (30.2 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.40 m (11.2 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.80 m (5.9 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 2,948 kg (6,499 lbs) | 5,300 kg (11,684 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,361 kg (3,000 lbs) | 1,650 kg (3,638 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 37.6 m² (405 ft²) | 52.0 m² (560 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 12 HP | 21 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 38 L (10.0 gal) | 100 L (26.4 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 57 L (15.1 gal) | 180 L (47.6 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 1 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1986 J/28 and Hanse 342 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 342 is a 2000s offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 342 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.
In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hanse 342 at 10.30m (33.8ft) with a 3.40m beam. The Hanse 342 is 1.64m longer than the 1986 J/28. The Hanse 342 displaces approximately 80% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 342, with an SA/D of 17.38 and 52.0 m² of canvas, offers good sail power for versatile performance. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Hanse 342 has a comfort ratio of 17.6 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 31.1% for the Hanse 342, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hanse 342 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 180L water and 100L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hanse 342 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hanse 342 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats