1986 J/28 vs 2007 Elan 310 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
2007 Elan 310

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/282007 Elan 310
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsElan
Year1986–19902007–2012
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSASlovenia
DesignerRod JohnstoneRob Humphreys
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)9.34 m (30.6 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)8.10 m (26.6 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.10 m (10.2 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.85 m (6.1 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)4,500 kg (9,921 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,300 kg (2,866 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)42.0 m² (452 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP18 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)60 L (15.9 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins12

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
2007 Elan 310
15.66
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
2007 Elan 310
28.89
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
2007 Elan 310
0.75
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
2007 Elan 310
21.35

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and 2007 Elan 310 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the 2007 Elan 310 is a 2000s offering from Elan from Slovenia. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The 2007 Elan 310 was designed by Rob Humphreys.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 2007 Elan 310 at 9.34m (30.6ft) with a 3.10m beam. The 2007 Elan 310 is 0.68m longer than the 1986 J/28. The 2007 Elan 310 displaces approximately 53% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The 2007 Elan 310, with an SA/D of 15.66 and 42.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The 2007 Elan 310 has a comfort ratio of 21.4 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 28.9% for the 2007 Elan 310, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The 2007 Elan 310 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 120L water and 60L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 2007 Elan 310 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · 2007 Elan 310