1986 J/28 vs Hanse 315 — Comparison

1986 J/28
VS
Hanse 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 J/28Hanse 315
General
ManufacturerJ/BoatsHanse
Year1986–19902010–2016
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAGermany
DesignerRod Johnstonejudel/vrolijk & co
Dimensions
LOA8.66 m (28.4 ft)9.65 m (31.7 ft)
LWL7.32 m (24.0 ft)8.55 m (28.1 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)3.15 m (10.3 ft)
Draft1.68 m (5.5 ft)1.65 m (5.4 ft)
Weight
Displacement2,948 kg (6,499 lbs)4,200 kg (9,259 lbs)
Ballast1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)1,200 kg (2,646 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area37.6 m² (405 ft²)41.5 m² (447 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine12 HP15 HP
Fuel Capacity38 L (10.0 gal)85 L (22.5 gal)
Water Capacity57 L (15.1 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Accommodation
Berths54
Cabins11

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 J/28
18.59
Hanse 315
16.20
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 J/28
46.17
Hanse 315
28.57
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 J/28
0.85
Hanse 315
0.78
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 J/28
17.20
Hanse 315
17.75

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 J/28 and Hanse 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1986 J/28 is a 1980s design by J/Boats from USA, while the Hanse 315 is a modern offering from Hanse from Germany. The 1986 J/28 was penned by Rod Johnstone. The Hanse 315 was designed by judel/vrolijk & co.

In terms of size, the 1986 J/28 measures 8.66m (28.4ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the Hanse 315 at 9.65m (31.7ft) with a 3.15m beam. The Hanse 315 is 0.99m longer than the 1986 J/28. The Hanse 315 displaces approximately 42% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 J/28 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 18.59 and 37.6 m² of sail area. The Hanse 315, with an SA/D of 16.20 and 41.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1986 J/28 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 J/28 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 17.2) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.85). The Hanse 315 has a comfort ratio of 17.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 46.2% for the 1986 J/28 and 28.6% for the Hanse 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 J/28 provides 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L of water capacity and 38L of fuel. The Hanse 315 offers 4 berths in 1 cabin with 120L water and 85L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The Hanse 315 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 J/28 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 J/28 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 J/28 · Hanse 315