1986 Valiant 40 vs 1981 Valiant 32 — Comparison

1986 Valiant 401986 Valiant 40
VS
1981 Valiant 32

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1986 Valiant 401981 Valiant 32
General
ManufacturerValiantValiant
Year1986–20011981–1992
TypeCutterCutter
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerBob PerryBob Perry
Dimensions
LOA12.19 m (40.0 ft)9.75 m (32.0 ft)
LWL9.75 m (32.0 ft)7.92 m (26.0 ft)
Beam3.71 m (12.2 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement9,072 kg (20,000 lbs)5,443 kg (12,000 lbs)
Ballast3,629 kg (8,001 lbs)2,268 kg (5,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area70.3 m² (757 ft²)43.0 m² (463 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeModified fullModified full
Engine & Tanks
Engine40 HP25 HP
Fuel Capacity189 L (49.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity340 L (89.8 gal)151 L (39.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths75
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1986 Valiant 40
16.42
1981 Valiant 32
14.12
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1986 Valiant 40
40.00
1981 Valiant 32
41.67
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1986 Valiant 40
0.71
1981 Valiant 32
0.73
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1986 Valiant 40
22.13
1981 Valiant 32
24.77

Detailed Comparison

The 1986 Valiant 40 and 1981 Valiant 32 represent two takes on cutter-rigged sailing. The 1986 Valiant 40 is a 1980s design by Valiant from USA, while the 1981 Valiant 32 is a 1980s offering from Valiant from USA. The 1986 Valiant 40 was penned by Bob Perry. The 1981 Valiant 32 was designed by Bob Perry.

In terms of size, the 1986 Valiant 40 measures 12.19m (40.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.71m, compared to the 1981 Valiant 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1986 Valiant 40 is 2.44m longer than the 1981 Valiant 32. The 1986 Valiant 40 displaces approximately 67% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1986 Valiant 40 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.42 and 70.3 m² of sail area. The 1981 Valiant 32, with an SA/D of 14.12 and 43.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1986 Valiant 40 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1986 Valiant 40 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 22.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1981 Valiant 32 has a comfort ratio of 24.8 and a capsize screening value of 0.73. The ballast ratios are 40.0% for the 1986 Valiant 40 and 41.7% for the 1981 Valiant 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1986 Valiant 40 provides 7 berths in 2 cabins with 340L of water capacity and 189L of fuel. The 1981 Valiant 32 offers 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1981 Valiant 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1986 Valiant 40 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1986 Valiant 40 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1986 Valiant 40 · 1981 Valiant 32