1988 C&C 32 vs 1988 Moody 36 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
1988 Moody 361988 Moody 36

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 321988 Moody 36
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsMoody
Year1988–19931988–1993
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUK
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianBill Dixon
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.14 m (30.0 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.51 m (11.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)6,800 kg (14,991 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)2,700 kg (5,952 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)54.0 m² (581 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP28 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)120 L (31.7 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)200 L (52.8 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
1988 Moody 36
15.29
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
1988 Moody 36
39.71
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
1988 Moody 36
0.74
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
1988 Moody 36
20.90

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and 1988 Moody 36 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the 1988 Moody 36 is a 1980s offering from Moody from UK. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The 1988 Moody 36 was designed by Bill Dixon.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the 1988 Moody 36 at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.51m beam. The 1988 Moody 36 is 1.22m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The 1988 Moody 36 displaces approximately 50% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The 1988 Moody 36, with an SA/D of 15.29 and 54.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The 1988 Moody 36 has a comfort ratio of 20.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.74. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 39.7% for the 1988 Moody 36, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The 1988 Moody 36 offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 200L water and 120L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Moody 36 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 Moody 36 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · 1988 Moody 36