1988 C&C 32 vs Hunter 30 — Comparison
Hunter 30
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1988 C&C 32 | Hunter 30 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | C&C Yachts | Hunter |
| Year | 1988–1993 | 1991–1996 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | Canada | USA |
| Designer | Cuthbertson & Cassian | Hunter Design Team |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) | 9.14 m (30.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.23 m (27.0 ft) | 7.92 m (26.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.28 m (10.8 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.83 m (6.0 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,536 kg (10,000 lbs) | 3,856 kg (8,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,996 kg (4,400 lbs) | 1,588 kg (3,501 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 45.8 m² (493 ft²) | 41.0 m² (441 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 18 HP | 18 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 68 L (18.0 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 114 L (30.1 gal) | 114 L (30.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1988 C&C 32 and Hunter 30 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Hunter 30 is a 1990s offering from Hunter from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Hunter 30 was designed by Hunter Design Team.
In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Hunter 30 at 9.14m (30.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1988 C&C 32 is 0.61m longer than the Hunter 30. The 1988 C&C 32 displaces approximately 18% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Hunter 30, with an SA/D of 16.94 and 41.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Hunter 30 has a comfort ratio of 19.5 and a capsize screening value of 0.78. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 41.2% for the Hunter 30, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Hunter 30 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 30 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Hunter 30