1988 C&C 32 vs Catalina 36 MkII — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
Catalina 36 MkII

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 32Catalina 36 MkII
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCatalina
Year1988–19931999–2006
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)10.97 m (36.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)9.60 m (31.5 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.55 m (11.6 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.83 m (6.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)6,577 kg (14,500 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)2,495 kg (5,501 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)56.5 m² (608 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP27 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)95 L (25.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)189 L (49.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths67
Cabins22

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
Catalina 36 MkII
16.35
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
Catalina 36 MkII
37.94
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
Catalina 36 MkII
0.76
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
Catalina 36 MkII
18.65

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and Catalina 36 MkII represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Catalina 36 MkII is a 1990s offering from Catalina from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Catalina 36 MkII was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 36 MkII at 10.97m (36.0ft) with a 3.55m beam. The Catalina 36 MkII is 1.22m longer than the 1988 C&C 32. The Catalina 36 MkII displaces approximately 45% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 36 MkII, with an SA/D of 16.35 and 56.5 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 36 MkII has a comfort ratio of 18.7 and a capsize screening value of 0.76. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 37.9% for the Catalina 36 MkII, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Catalina 36 MkII offers 7 berths in 2 cabins with 189L water and 95L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The Catalina 36 MkII offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Catalina 36 MkII