1988 C&C 32 vs Catalina 315 — Comparison

1988 C&C 32
VS
Catalina 315Catalina 315

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 C&C 32Catalina 315
General
ManufacturerC&C YachtsCatalina
Year1988–19932014
TypeSloopSloop
CountryCanadaUSA
DesignerCuthbertson & CassianGerry Douglas
Dimensions
LOA9.75 m (32.0 ft)9.45 m (31.0 ft)
LWL8.23 m (27.0 ft)8.61 m (28.2 ft)
Beam3.28 m (10.8 ft)3.20 m (10.5 ft)
Draft1.83 m (6.0 ft)1.68 m (5.5 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)4,536 kg (10,000 lbs)
Ballast1,996 kg (4,400 lbs)1,814 kg (3,999 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area45.8 m² (493 ft²)44.0 m² (474 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFinFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine18 HP21 HP
Fuel Capacity68 L (18.0 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Water Capacity114 L (30.1 gal)132 L (34.9 gal)
Accommodation
Berths65
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 C&C 32
16.98
Catalina 315
16.32
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 C&C 32
44.00
Catalina 315
39.99
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 C&C 32
0.79
Catalina 315
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 C&C 32
18.99
Catalina 315
18.85

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 C&C 32 and Catalina 315 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 C&C 32 is a 1980s design by C&C Yachts from Canada, while the Catalina 315 is a modern offering from Catalina from USA. The 1988 C&C 32 was penned by Cuthbertson & Cassian. The Catalina 315 was designed by Gerry Douglas.

In terms of size, the 1988 C&C 32 measures 9.75m (32.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.28m, compared to the Catalina 315 at 9.45m (31.0ft) with a 3.20m beam. The 1988 C&C 32 is 0.30m longer than the Catalina 315.

Looking at performance, the 1988 C&C 32 has moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising with an SA/D ratio of 16.98 and 45.8 m² of sail area. The Catalina 315, with an SA/D of 16.32 and 44.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1988 C&C 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 C&C 32 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 19.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.79). The Catalina 315 has a comfort ratio of 18.9 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 44.0% for the 1988 C&C 32 and 40.0% for the Catalina 315, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 C&C 32 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 114L of water capacity and 68L of fuel. The Catalina 315 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 132L water and 76L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 C&C 32 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1988 C&C 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: The 1988 C&C 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 C&C 32 · Catalina 315