Hunter 33 vs 1982 Freedom 28 — Comparison
Hunter 33
1982 Freedom 28
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | Hunter 33 | 1982 Freedom 28 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Hunter | Freedom |
| Year | 1988–1994 | 1982–1988 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | Hunter Design Team | Garry Hoyt |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 10.06 m (33.0 ft) | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) |
| LWL | 8.53 m (28.0 ft) | 7.01 m (23.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.35 m (11.0 ft) | 2.84 m (9.3 ft) |
| Draft | 1.68 m (5.5 ft) | 1.14 m (3.7 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,763 kg (10,501 lbs) | 2,495 kg (5,501 lbs) |
| Ballast | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) | 907 kg (2,000 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 48.0 m² (517 ft²) | 29.0 m² (312 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Fin | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 21 HP | 10 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 38 L (10.0 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 6 | 5 |
| Cabins | 2 | 1 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The Hunter 33 and 1982 Freedom 28 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The Hunter 33 is a 1980s design by Hunter from USA, while the 1982 Freedom 28 is a 1980s offering from Freedom from USA. The Hunter 33 was penned by Hunter Design Team. The 1982 Freedom 28 was designed by Garry Hoyt.
In terms of size, the Hunter 33 measures 10.06m (33.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.35m, compared to the 1982 Freedom 28 at 8.53m (28.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The Hunter 33 is 1.53m longer than the 1982 Freedom 28. The Hunter 33 displaces approximately 91% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the Hunter 33 has good sail power for versatile performance with an SA/D ratio of 17.23 and 48.0 m² of sail area. The 1982 Freedom 28, with an SA/D of 16.02 and 29.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The Hunter 33 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the Hunter 33 offers a firm, racing-oriented motion (comfort ratio: 18.1) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.80). The 1982 Freedom 28 has a comfort ratio of 17.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.84. The ballast ratios are 38.1% for the Hunter 33 and 36.4% for the 1982 Freedom 28, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the Hunter 33 provides 6 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1982 Freedom 28 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 57L water and 38L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The Hunter 33 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The Hunter 33 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The Hunter 33 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: Hunter 33 · 1982 Freedom 28