1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 1972 Ericson 32 — Comparison
1972 Ericson 32
Specifications Side by Side
| Specification | 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 | 1972 Ericson 32 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Manufacturer | Pacific Seacraft | Ericson |
| Year | 1988–2007 | 1972–1978 |
| Type | Sloop | Sloop |
| Country | USA | USA |
| Designer | William Crealock | Bruce King |
| Dimensions | ||
| LOA | 9.45 m (31.0 ft) | 9.75 m (32.0 ft) |
| LWL | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) | 7.62 m (25.0 ft) |
| Beam | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) | 3.05 m (10.0 ft) |
| Draft | 1.37 m (4.5 ft) | 1.52 m (5.0 ft) |
| Weight | ||
| Displacement | 4,990 kg (11,001 lbs) | 4,309 kg (9,500 lbs) |
| Ballast | 2,177 kg (4,799 lbs) | 1,814 kg (3,999 lbs) |
| Sailing | ||
| Sail Area | 40.5 m² (436 ft²) | 39.0 m² (420 ft²) |
| Hull Material | Fiberglass | Fiberglass |
| Keel Type | Full | Fin |
| Engine & Tanks | ||
| Engine | 25 HP | 15 HP |
| Fuel Capacity | 76 L (20.1 gal) | 57 L (15.1 gal) |
| Water Capacity | 151 L (39.9 gal) | 95 L (25.1 gal) |
| Accommodation | ||
| Berths | 5 | 6 |
| Cabins | 2 | 2 |
Performance Comparison
Detailed Comparison
The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 1972 Ericson 32 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1972 Ericson 32 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 1972 Ericson 32 was designed by Bruce King.
In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1972 Ericson 32 at 9.75m (32.0ft) with a 3.05m beam. The 1972 Ericson 32 is 0.30m longer than the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 16% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.
Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1972 Ericson 32, with an SA/D of 14.97 and 39.0 m² of canvas, offers modest sail power for its displacement. The 1972 Ericson 32 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.
For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1972 Ericson 32 has a comfort ratio of 22.0 and a capsize screening value of 0.75. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 42.1% for the 1972 Ericson 32, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.
Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1972 Ericson 32 offers 6 berths in 2 cabins with 95L water and 57L fuel capacity.
Verdict
For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.
For racing: The 1972 Ericson 32 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.
For liveaboard: The 1972 Ericson 32 offers more sleeping accommodation, making it better suited for extended living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.
Compare Different Boats
Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats
Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 1972 Ericson 32