1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 vs 1976 Ericson 29 — Comparison

1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
VS
1976 Ericson 291976 Ericson 29

Specifications Side by Side

Specification1988 Pacific Seacraft 311976 Ericson 29
General
ManufacturerPacific SeacraftEricson
Year1988–20071976–1983
TypeSloopSloop
CountryUSAUSA
DesignerWilliam CrealockBruce King
Dimensions
LOA9.45 m (31.0 ft)8.84 m (29.0 ft)
LWL7.62 m (25.0 ft)7.32 m (24.0 ft)
Beam3.05 m (10.0 ft)2.84 m (9.3 ft)
Draft1.37 m (4.5 ft)1.52 m (5.0 ft)
Weight
Displacement4,990 kg (11,001 lbs)3,175 kg (7,000 lbs)
Ballast2,177 kg (4,799 lbs)1,361 kg (3,000 lbs)
Sailing
Sail Area40.5 m² (436 ft²)34.0 m² (366 ft²)
Hull MaterialFiberglassFiberglass
Keel TypeFullFin
Engine & Tanks
Engine25 HP13 HP
Fuel Capacity76 L (20.1 gal)45 L (11.9 gal)
Water Capacity151 L (39.9 gal)76 L (20.1 gal)
Accommodation
Berths55
Cabins21

Performance Comparison

SA/D Ratio (Higher = more sail power per displacement)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
14.09
1976 Ericson 29
15.99
Ballast Ratio (Higher = more stability)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
43.63
1976 Ericson 29
42.87
Capsize Ratio (Lower = safer offshore)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
0.71
1976 Ericson 29
0.77
Comfort Ratio (Higher = gentler motion)
1988 Pacific Seacraft 31
26.02
1976 Ericson 29
20.09

Detailed Comparison

The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 1976 Ericson 29 represent two takes on sloop-rigged sailing. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is a 1980s design by Pacific Seacraft from USA, while the 1976 Ericson 29 is a 1970s offering from Ericson from USA. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 was penned by William Crealock. The 1976 Ericson 29 was designed by Bruce King.

In terms of size, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 measures 9.45m (31.0ft) overall with a beam of 3.05m, compared to the 1976 Ericson 29 at 8.84m (29.0ft) with a 2.84m beam. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is 0.61m longer than the 1976 Ericson 29. The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 displaces approximately 57% more than its counterpart, which significantly affects how each boat handles in different sea states.

Looking at performance, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 has modest sail power for its displacement with an SA/D ratio of 14.09 and 40.5 m² of sail area. The 1976 Ericson 29, with an SA/D of 15.99 and 34.0 m² of canvas, offers moderate sail power suitable for relaxed cruising. The 1976 Ericson 29 has the edge in terms of raw sailing performance.

For comfort and safety, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 offers a moderate motion comfort level (comfort ratio: 26.0) and excellent capsize resistance suitable for offshore voyaging (capsize ratio: 0.71). The 1976 Ericson 29 has a comfort ratio of 20.1 and a capsize screening value of 0.77. The ballast ratios are 43.6% for the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 and 42.9% for the 1976 Ericson 29, reflecting their respective approaches to stability.

Below deck, the 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 provides 5 berths in 2 cabins with 151L of water capacity and 76L of fuel. The 1976 Ericson 29 offers 5 berths in 1 cabin with 76L water and 45L fuel capacity.

Verdict

For cruising: The 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 is the better choice for comfortable cruising thanks to its higher comfort ratio, offering a gentler motion at sea that crews will appreciate on longer passages.

For racing: The 1976 Ericson 29 has the performance advantage with its superior SA/D ratio, meaning more sail power relative to its displacement for competitive sailing.

For liveaboard: Both boats provide similar accommodation, making either a viable choice for living aboard. Consider water and fuel capacity for extended stays away from marinas.

Compare Different Boats

Looking for a different matchup? Browse All Boats

Or view individual specs: 1988 Pacific Seacraft 31 · 1976 Ericson 29